A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)


Abstract

Introduction: Dysgraphia (disorder in dictation, disorder of written expression) is considered as one of common disorders among students, where there are different methods on how to cope with and treat it. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s multi sensory approach on students’ dictation disorder in Rafsanjan city in 2015.
Methods: Twenty six students (age 7-11 years), suffering from dysgraphia, were selected using convenience sampling method from those who referred to Rafsanjan’s Javaneh Consultation Center and randomly divided into two groups, neurofeedback and Fernald. Initially, we conducted a dictation test (pretest) and Raven’s Progressive Matrices. The students that their dictations score were 50/100 or lower enrolled to study. In the NFB group, we applied 15 sessions of neurofeedback training in areas C3 and C4 to strengthen the SMR waves, whereas the second group received 15 sessions of training using Fernald’s multi-sensory approach. Then, both groups were participated in a dictation test at the end of their training processes. Finally, data analyzed by using independent and paired t-test and Cohen′s effect size.
Results: The mean score of dictation in NFB and Fernald groups were 34.2 ± 3.87 and 32.9 ± 4.66 respectively. The difference was not significance (P=0.043). The mean scores of dictation in posttest in NFB and Fernald groups were higher than pretest. The difference was significance (P < 0.001). However, neurofeedback method showed a much more significant influence in mitigating this disorder as compared to Fernald approach.
Conclusions: The results of our study indicated that each of both Fernald and neurofeedback training methods can be used to improve dictation performance among students suffered from dictation disorder, where depending upon students’ circumstances and parents’ choice, the process of selecting an appropriate method out of these methods can be proceeded.

Keywords

Neurofeedback Training; Fernald Multisensory; Approach; Agraphia

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)


Authors

Vida Harandi

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran

Noshirvan Khezri Moghadam

Affiliation: Department of Psychology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)


References

1. Babapour Kheyr Aldin J. The comparison of motor skills of dyslexic and nondyslexic students. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2007;28(4):7-10.
2. Fernandez T, Harmony T, Fernandez-Bouzas A, Diaz-Comas L, Prado- Alcala RA, Valdes-Sosa P, et al. Changes in EEG current sources induced by neurofeedback in learning disabled children. An exploratory study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007;32(3-4):169-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-007-9044-8 PMID: 17978869
3. Seif Naraghi M, Naderi EA. Special failures in learning. Tehran: Mikal Pub; 2005.
4. lerner J. learning disabiliyies: theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1993.
5. Babapour Kheyr Aldin J, Sobhi Gharamaleki N. Learning disorders: Diagnosis and treatment approch. Tehran: Soroush Pub; 2001.
6. Gholizadeh Z, Babapour J, Rostami R, Beirami M, Poursharifi H. Effects of neurofeedback on visual memory. J Behav Sci. 2011;4(4):9-10.
7. Micoulaud-Franchi JA, Salvo F, Bioulac S, Fovet T. Neurofeedback in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Efficacy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(12):1091-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.09.493 PMID: 27871645
8. Fatollahpour L, Babapour Kheyr Aldin J, Mahdavian H, Bafandeh Gharamaleki H. A comparison of neurofeedback and Fernald’s method effectiveness in Improving the Intelligence of Children with dyslexia (case study). Learn Disabil J. 2013;2(4):103-23.
9. Heydari AR, Hafezi F, Tahankar Dezfoli M. Evaluation and compare the two methods of multi-sensory and Kephart’s perceptual-motor processes on reduction in programming dictates impaired students. J Soc Psychol. 2009;41(12):65-78.
10. Mahdavian H. compare the efficacy of neurofeedback and Fernald
multi-sensory approach to the treatment of dyslexia. . Tabriz: Tabriz University; 2011.
11. Aghababaei S, Malekpour M, Abedi A. Effectiveness of Executive Functions Training on Academic Performance of Children with Spelling Learning Disability. Adv Cogn Sci. 2012;14(2):63-72.
12. Hassannia A, Najafi M, Mohammadrezaee A. The comparison the effectiveness of fernald multi-sensory instruction method and application
mnemonics devices in improving dictation problems elementary school third grade dictated disorder Students. J Learn Disabil. 2016;5(3):122-44.
13. Haghtalab T, Yazdani F, Aghaee A. Comparingthe effectiveness of multi-sense teaching methods (Orton and Fernald) upon students’ handwriting disorders at elementary schools of Malayer. Cogn Strateg Learn. 2015;3(4):71-85.
14. Delpasand K. compare the effect Fernald multi-sensory and sensory integration approach based on improving Dictation Disorderin thirdgrade students tehran: Islamic Azad University, Tehran branch; 2013.
15. Mansurnejad Z, Kajbaf MB, Molavi H. The Effetiveness of Fernald’s Multi- Sensory Training on Dysgraphia and Dictation In Second Grade Primary Students. J Soc Psychol. 2012;7(24):99-111.
16. Taghvayi D, Vaziri S, Kashani FL. The Effectiveness of Integrative Approach, Fernald Multi-Sensory Technique on Decrease Reading
Disability. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;69:1264-9. DOI: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.12.060
17. Yaghoubi A, Mohagheghi H, Ghafoori Asar M, Rashid K. Comparison of the Effects of Fernald Multi-Sensory and Frostig Visual Perception Methods on Improvement of Reading Performance in Dyslexic Male Students in Hamedan City. Psychol Except Individ. 2013;3(9):21-32.
18. Narimani M, Noori R, Abolghasemi A. Comparison of the effectiveness of phonological awareness strategies and Fernald multi-sensory to improve reading skill and comprehension of dyslexia students. Learn Disabil J. 2016;4(3):104-20.
19. Khanjani Z, Mahdavian H, Ahmadi P, Hashemi T, Fathollahpour L. Comparison between the Effect of Neurofeedback and Fernald’s Multisensory Approachon TreatingChildren with Dyslexia. Psychol Except Individ. 2013;2(8):117-47.
20. Salehi A, Soleymani M. Mid East J Disabil Stud. 2012;2(2):8-18.
21. Walker JE. QEEG-Guided Neurofeedback for Remediation of Dysgraphia.
Biofeedback. 2012;40(3):113-14.
22. Marzbani H, Marateb HR, Mansourian M. Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience. 2016;7(2):143-58. DOI: 10.15412/J.BCN.03070208 PMID: PMC4892319
23. Kraus D, Horowitz-Kraus T. The Effect of Learning on Feedback- Related Potentials in Adolescents with Dyslexia: An EEG-ERP Study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100486. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0100486 PMID: PMC4065048
24. Breteler MHM, Arns M, Peters S, Giepmans I, Verhoeven L. Improvements in Spelling after QEEG-based Neurofeedback in Dyslexia: A Randomized Controlled Treatment Study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2010;35(1):5-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-009-9105-2 PMID: PMC2837193
25. Khanjani Z, Mahdavian H, Ahmadi P, Hashemi T, Fathollapour L. The Effect of Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dyslexia of Second-grade Students in Tabriz: A case study. Psychol Except Individ. 2012;2(6):135-57.
26. Alidusti Shahraki N, Asgari K. The Effectiveness of neurofeedback training on improvement of Working Memory students with Dyslexia: A single case study. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2016;18(1):105-21.
27. Vernon D, Egner T, Cooper N, Compton T, Neilands C, Sheri A, et al. The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;47(1):75-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00091-0 PMID: 12543448
28. Oraki M, Rahmanian M, Tehrani N, Heydari S. Effective of neuoro- FeedBack on improvement workingMemory in Children with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychol. 2015;1(1):41-51.
29. Jahanseir M, Firooz Abadi SM, Ghoshouni M, Motie Nasrabadi A. The effect of individual upper alpha band enhancing neurofeedbac
kon reaction-time as an indicator of short-term memory in women employee’s. Iranian South Med J. 2014;17(5):834-46.
30. Moosanezhad Jeddim E. The effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment on neuroPsychological function in children with dyslexia. Tabriz: Tabriz University; 2011.
31. Gholizadeh ZA, Babapour J, Rostami R, Beirami M, Poursharifi H. Effects of Neurofeedback on Working Memory. J Psychol. 2010;5(18):87-100.
32. Bigdeli I, Makvand Hosseini S, Asbaghi E, Hosseini Largany SF, Rashn S. Effects of Neurofeedback on Cognitive Function with Emphasis on Memory. Iranian J Cogn Educ. 2014;1(2):27-32.
33. Xiong S, Cheng C, Wu X, Guo X, Yao L, Zhang J. Working memory training using EEG neurofeedback in normal young adults. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3637-44. DOI: 10.3233/BME-141191 PMID: 25227078
34. Kober SE, Schweiger D, Witte M, Reichert JL, Grieshofer P, Neuper C, et al. Specific effects of EEG based neurofeedback training on memory functions in post-stroke victims. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:107. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0105-6 PMID: 26625906
35. Escolano C, Navarro-Gil M, Garcia-Campayo J, Minguez J. The effects
of a single session of upper alpha neurofeedback for cognitive
enhancement: a sham-controlled study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback.
2014;39(3-4):227-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-014-9262-9
PMID: 25267413
36. Cannon KB, Sherlin L, Lyle RR. Neurofeedback Efficacy in the Treatment of a 43-Year-Old Female Stroke Victim: A Case Study. J Neurother. 2010;14(2):107-21. DOI: 10.1080/10874201003772155
37. Reddy RP, Rajan J, Bagavathula I, Kandavel T. Neurofeedback Training to Enhance Learning and Memory in Patient with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Case Study. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil.14(1):21-8.
38. Ratey J. A user’s guide to the brain: Perception, attention and the four theatres the brain. New York: Vintage; 2001.
39. Akbari Yeganeh Z, Dolatshahee B, Rezaee Dogaheh E. The Effectiveness of Neurofeedback Training on Reducing Symptoms of War Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Pract Clin Psychol. 2016;4(1):17-24.
40. von Stein A, Rappelsberger P, Sarnthein J, Petsche H. Synchronization between temporal and parietal cortex during multimodal object processing in man. Cereb Cortex. 1999;9(2):137-50. PMID: 10220226
41. Hanslmayr S, Sauseng P, Doppelmayr M, Schabus M, Klimesch W. Increasing individual upper alpha power by neurofeedback improves cognitive performance in human subjects. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s10484-005-2169-8 PMID: 15889581
42. Oh HJ, Song GB. Effects of neurofeedback training on the brain wave of adults with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(10):2938- 41. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.2938 PMID: 27821966
43. McDonald AR, Muraskin J, Dam NT, Froehlich C, Puccio B, Pellman J, et al. The Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback Based Stratification of Default Network Regulation Neuroimaging Data Repository. Neuroimage. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.048 PMID: 27836708
44. Pahlevanian A, Alirezaloo N, Naghel S, Alidadi F, Nejati V, Kianbakht M. Neurofeedback Associated with Neurocognitive-Rehabilitation Training on Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Int J Ment Health Addict. 2015;15(1):100-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-015-9621-7
45. Sharifi S, Lajverdi L, Nazari M, Ghorbani M. Comparison effect of neuroofeedback training with occupational therapy and occupational therapy alone on stroke patient memory. Pajouhan Sci J. 2014;12(2):8-17.

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)


Citation tools

Vancouver

Harandi V, Khezri Moghadam N. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia). Focus on Sciences. 2106; 3(2):1-6


APA

Harandi, V., & Khezri Moghadam, N. (2106). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia). Focus on Sciences, 3(2), 1-6.


Chicago

Vida Harandi, and Noshirvan Khezri Moghadam "A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)". Focus on Sciences 3, no. 2 (2106).

A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Neurofeedback (NFB) Training Method and Fernald’s Multisensory Approach on Dictation Performance among Students Suffering from Dictation Disorder (Dysgraphia)


Share this article

To share this article click on each icone.